neutrality and nat

Hello Joao,

Shouldn't RIPE NCC modify it's questions to say have you considered IPv6
instead of asking if they have thought of using NAT.  If RIPE would like to
further IPv6 shouldn't it asking it's customers (IPv4) about using IPv6!!!!!
:-)

Stuart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joao Luis Silva Damas" <joao at ripe.net>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com>; <lir-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: neutrality and nat


> Hi randy,
>
> the policy advice set by the LIRs has been, to the best of my
> knowledge, to ask requesters whether they have considered using
> private addressing for their network, not to force anyone to use it.
> Just ask, nothing else.
>
> Where have you seen that presentation?
>
> Joao
>
>
> At 11:59 +0000 13/5/02, Randy Bush wrote:
> >i just watched a ripe presentation which claimed to be technology
neutral,
> >yet advised isps to use nats without telling how they break applications,
> >blah blah blah.  this is not neutral, and is, imiho, really bad advice to
> >give to innocent people.  is this ripe or lir policy?
> >
> >randy
>
>