neutrality and nat

In message <E177EuB-000PTT-00 at roam.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>> the policy advice set by the LIRs has been, to the best of my 
>> knowledge, to ask requesters whether they have considered using 
>> private addressing for their network, not to force anyone to use it. 
>
>there were two slides telling why/when to use nat.  there were none
>on why not.

Uhm, Randy, is this some personal crusade or something ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.