neutrality and nat
Philip Smith pfs at cisco.com
Mon May 13 14:11:57 CEST 2002
Mmmm well, I didn't hear Mirjam saying "you must use NATs" in this presentation, just saying that "people can use NATs and private addresses". She did mention that they broke applications, and had known problems... Would have been helpful on the slide though. I have a feeling this is going to start another NAT war on the list. :-( philip -- At 11:59 13/05/2002 +0000, Randy Bush wrote: >i just watched a ripe presentation which claimed to be technology neutral, >yet advised isps to use nats without telling how they break applications, >blah blah blah. this is not neutral, and is, imiho, really bad advice to >give to innocent people. is this ripe or lir policy? > >randy
[ lir-wg Archives ]