IP addresses for the RIPE NCC
Joao Luis Silva Damas joao at ripe.net
Mon May 13 12:37:19 CEST 2002
Hi, to wrap up the discussion. We should get addresses from upstream provider(s). Next question: how many? I guess the RIPE NCC offices are "a site" and thus the need is for a /48 which we subnet internally. Probably another one for the RIPE Meeting, which is another site (a mobile one), with its own subnets. So far so good. Doubts come when I think about the tunnels we want to provide to our staff, as we do with IPv4. If I read the policy and the IETF statements, each of these sites, which normally have a Linux box acting as end point and subnets internally (even if each subnet usually has no more than one other box), would need a /48, as that is the minimum for a site. Or should we assign, say /56's? We estimate about 50 of these cases in a reasonable period of time. What makes a site? The length of the cable? The technology used to get the packets inside those cables? The desire to subnet? Something else? I have never been able to get a definition that suits more than a small portion of the people I talk to. I am very interested in your opinion both because we would like to roll out IPv6 services in the near future and to see what is the community's interpretation of the policy as a benchmark for our hostmasters. So consider yourselves the hostmasters for our request as I would like to avoid our own departments calling a judgement on our own address resources. Jooa
[ lir-wg Archives ]