Do not remember this
Dmitry Morozovsky marck at rinet.ru
Wed Mar 6 13:49:25 CET 2002
Colleagues, On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 bon at ripn.net wrote: > we'do support this suggestion, managers of the LIRs should have > opportunity to update regid info without contacting NCC, however > inner database surely must be managed by NCC staff themself. > Trying to resolve this contradiction it would be reasonable to discuss > *regid* database object. I mean short/public version of regid file > (regid, descr, lir-contact and smth. else), it may be protected > by LIR and NCC maintainers, NCC will act accordingly having received > update notification from database while LIR'll send (very occasionally) > serious updates to lir-help box. We've got very interesting point here. I'm afraid this, earlier or later, leads us to the main point which RIPE NCC wants (or at least seems to want) to avoid: public and private parts of the Database. Although it would be very useful to hide some valuable info from anyone except the maintainer, the process of both defining such data and managing it should be made very clear and, of course, agreed by the community. Perhaps now is the time to widely discuss it? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ lir-wg Archives ]