[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
David Kessens david at IPRG.nokia.com
Thu Jun 13 22:57:49 CEST 2002
Geoff, On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:02:52PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote: > > >I tend to agree with Nigel, although I'd go for something even > >plainer like DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER (I know > >they're a bit verbose but they're absolutely clear ;-) It also makes > >clear that addresses assigned to an LIR in the role of END-USER are > >exactly that. That way, an individual who is struggling with English > >as a second language (or even their first language ;-) can be > >absolutely clear of the status of a range of addresses. > > For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and > ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely! > > excellent suggestion Guy! > > Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements > for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED? I would like to second such a request. ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED seem to be confusing terms, even for the professionals in this business. David K. ---
[ lir-wg Archives ]