KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:07:09PM +0200, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
> As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea
> to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than
> any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs.
> 
> Comments?
> 

Good Idea !

A natural choice seems to be a safe place at a IX that is operated
and owned by an independend Company or Organisation, so that Chapter 11 candidates not interfer with the service. 

In my opinion is the placement of root namkeserver at some IX a good and safe choice for the future.

regards
 Robert Depenbrock

-- 
Energis-ISION                          Robert Depenbrock
SE Technical Consulting		 Harburger Schlossstr. 1
Hamburg - Germany    robert.depenbrock at energis-ision.com
http://www.energis-ision.com/     Tel.: +49-40-77175-263