[lir-wg] AS Number Policy

--On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:08:48 +1000 Philip Smith <pfs at cisco.com> 
wrote:

> It seems as though the RIPE NCC couldn't care less though about the
> forgery, and that is alarming given that address and AS allocation is
> supposed to be their function.


What is ofcourse interesting as well is - what can the NCC do to stop this 
or prevent it from happening in the future? They can send angry emails and 
remove the objects from the database (which ofcourse would be a good 
start...:) ), but they can't prevent the AS:es from being routed.

What is really interesting is that some upstream is actually accepting 
these AS:es as peers...

- kurtis -