[lir-wg] AS Number Policy

>   For example we do have some universities which have one upstream (us,
>   ACOnet) and peerings with other ISPs (for whatever reason) _but no
>   transit_ from them.
>
>   Some of them would be "visible" (e.g. those with legacy class B space),
>   others would be proxy aggregated into our /15 and "disappear".

Which is fine. They are "public" in the sense that a "large" number of 
AS:es see them.


>   But, to come back to another comment: we're discussing details of
>   routing configuration (because that's "easy"?) but I haven't seen any
>   comment yet on my question on price/effort vs. (expected) result ratio
>   (maybe because it's a bit more difficult? ;-).

I am not sure this has anything to do with routing configuration vs 
pricing. It has to do with application of AS-numbers and who are entiled to 
get/have one.

- kurtis -