[lir-wg] AS Number Policy

This has nothing to do with the private AS-number.

If an AS number existed in our backbone (public to CW) but not to
RIPE NCC's route server. Will that be considered NOT USED ?

Ping Lu
Cable & Wireless USA
Network Tools and Analysis Group
W: +1-703-292-2359
E: plu at cw.net



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Tremmel, WT5-RIPE [mailto:wtremmel at vianetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:27 PM
> To: Lu, Ping; 'Matthew Robinson'; Vladimir A. Jakovenko
> Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: RE: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy
> 
> 
> If it is nowhere advertised you could use a privat AS-number...
> 
> Wolfgang
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-lir-wg at ripe.net 
> [mailto:owner-lir-wg at ripe.net]On Behalf Of
> > Lu, Ping
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:55 PM
> > To: 'Matthew Robinson'; Vladimir A. Jakovenko
> > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net
> > Subject: RE: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy
> > 
> > 
> > Definitely there is AS number being used within our backbone but not
> > advertised to public
> > network. So the AS number should be allowed to be registered but not
> > advertised the same way
> > as IP address is treated.
> > 
> > Ping Lu
> > Cable & Wireless USA
> > Network Tools and Analysis Group
> > W: +1-703-292-2359
> > E: plu at cw.net
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matthew Robinson [mailto:matthew at crescent.org.uk]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:57 AM
> > > To: Vladimir A. Jakovenko
> > > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net
> > > Subject: Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In the documentation for address space provision is made for 
> > > assigning addresses to organisations that will NEVER be 
> > > connected to the Internet but require uniqueness from private 
> > > address space.
> > > 
> > > Whilst I can't think of a specific example to apply to AS 
> > > numbers, should this uniqueness be extended to AS numbers 
> > > that do not show up in the routing table but are very 
> much on-line?
> > > 
> > > I also recon 3 months to get online although given the length 
> > > of time it can take a big comapany to integrate a small one 
> > > lets say 12 months for returning.
> > > 
> > > Kind regards
> > > 
> > > Matthew
> > > 
>