[lir-wg] AS Number Policy

>Lets see the following example:
>
>   +-----------+        +-------+
>   | AS-UPLINK |        | AS-IX |
>   +---------o-+        +o------+
>             |           |
>            +o-----------o+
>            | AS-CUSTOMER |
>            +-------------+
>
>[ ... ]
>
>Should AS-CUSTOMER be considered as multihomed?

  Definitely, as they'd probably have more then one eBPG session, and
  probably a different routing policy.

  I don't see any reason to treat "customer" status (i.e. packets shipped
  for money) different from "peering" status (i.e. packets shipped for
  "free").

>-- 
>Regards,
>Vladimir.

  Wilfried.