Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects

Rimas,

you mean - than end-users could use this zz.unspecified reg-id in order
to perform reverse delegation 
records by themselves?


Tanja


Rimas Janusauskas wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Maybe it makes sense to cover PI assignments as zz.unspecified
> registry?
> 
> This should not harm checking robot and/or end-user   ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Rimas Janusauskas,
>         Vilnius University Hostmaster
> 
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Dominic Spratley wrote:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:00:28 +0200
> > From: Dominic Spratley <dominic at ripe.net>
> > To: Tanja Heimes <theimes at de.cw.net>
> > Cc: lir-wg at ripe.net
> > Subject: Re: Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects
> >
> > Hi Tanja,
> >
> > There are several reasons why we do not accept requests directly
> > from end-users. Most are based on the fact that the Internet
> > Registry system is hierarchical. This means that we are funded by
> > LIRs to provide services to them, not to end-users.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> >
> > Dominic Spratley,
> >
> > R.S. Assistant Manager,
> > RIPE NCC
> >
> >
> >
> > At 09:45 AM 4/24/2002 +0200, Tanja Heimes wrote:
> 
> > >
> > >My question now:
> > >
> > >Should  Provider Indepent IP space not be 100% Provider Indepent in
> > >concern to its administration in the RIPE DB?
> > >In my opinion the RIPE Robot should distinguish between PA and PI space
> > >and not request an reg-id for customers that own PI
> > >space and like to create a reverse delegation record.
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >
> > >Tanja Heimes
> > >

-- 
Tanja Heimes / IP Engineer		E-Mail Tanja.Heimes at de.cw.com

Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH	TEL. + 49 89 92699-0
Landsberger Strasse 155			Fax. + 49 89 92699-810
D-80687 Munich, Germany			web: http://www.cw.com/de