Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects

> There *IS* indeed a mandate on the RIPE NCC to provide services to the
> community at large. The RIPE Database is a fine example. However, the
handling of
> the in-addr tree is a membership service and as such only available to
> members of the RIPE NCC Association.

I think Wilfrieds said:


>But my biggest point of concern here is that this is another instance
 > where pretty *fundamental* operational (and policy) changes get
 > implemented unilaterally by the NCC (should I say hostmaster group
 > here?), without discussion, approval, and a look at the consequences and
 > *NOT EVEN* an information being distributed those *AFFECTED*: the LIR
 > community. We are left to find out by chance.

I would rephrase:
When was this deceided and by whom ?

-hph