IPv6 assignments to DNS root servers in the RIPE region

> create an administrative hierarchy based on /48 aggregates but I fully
> realise that his is going out on a limb. I think however, that if we
> were to use 'n' TLAs for nameservers, that I would prefer to see 'n'
> /48s in my routing table than 'n' /35s, this of course from the
> conservation point of view.
> 
> The same holds for Internet Exchanges. Perhaps for other sites as well.
> How do we plan to have AMS-IX reachable from networks that do not peer
> with AS1200, if the AMS-IX is assigned only a /48 ? I see two
> possibilities (obvious ones, that is).
> 1. Allocate /35 to AMS-IX and let it announce that from AS1200
> 2. Make global policy to have 2001:7f8::/32 prefixlen 48 and lower
> allowable.
3. http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/registration/ipv6/eix-interim.html

Or is this document deprecated ?

IX can have non globally routable adress space.
The NOC of an IX can have a /48 from any ISP, like any other organization.
I don't see the problem here.

-- 
Xavier Henner
Responsable de l'expérimentation IPv6
Nerim -- Fournisseur d'accès à Internet
URL: <http://www.nerim.net/>