[hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal / reservation revisited?
Gert Doering gert at space.net
Mon Oct 15 16:28:11 CEST 2001
Hi, to revive an old thread: On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:45:06PM +0200, James Aldridge wrote: > Gert Doering wrote: > > But you just named a reason: to be able to document where a certain > > network block "went to", and to document the allocation/assignment > > hierarchy in a transparent way without upsetting the NCC's tools. > > This is the "status: LIR-PARTITIONED" (formerly my "LIR-ALLOCATED") proposal. > This doesn't add any new registry types or change policy in any way but does > provide (among other things) the documentation function. >From what I understood reading Nuranis document and also discussing this at the LIR-WG session, there seems to be desire to move this further: * documentation, as in your proposal * and also do "hierarchical allocation", which will affect the 80% usage rule (imagine a LIR with many sub-allocations that tries to achieve internal aggregation - this will nearly automatically clash with the conservation goal). So there is a policy aspect involved, which the LIR-PARTITIONED proposal doesn't cover, but which seems to be desired. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
[ lir-wg Archives ]