Multihoming - Resilience or Independence
Masataka Ohta mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Wed Oct 10 22:44:43 CEST 2001
Poul-Henning Kamp; > I have been monitoring IPv6 for exactly this point: how do IPv6 propose > to give people redundancy/ressilience. > > So far I have not seen anybody really say "this is how it should be done". draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00.txt is dated April 2000. And, now, there even is a multi6 WG of IETF. > The best I have been able to gather is that it is expected that end > customers assign multiple IP# to their servers and leave the selection > to the DNS and the other end. I don't know if the "anycast" idea > was part of this solution but right now I certainly don't see any > other solution than DNS. > > My current advice to my customers are therefore: Multiple IP# per > server, use DNS for load-balancing. The problem is that load-balancing is not a reason for multi-homing. With the same amount of payment, you should be able to get more bandwidth from a single ISP (bulk discount) than from multiple ISPs that there is no need for load-balancing. Masataka Ohta
[ lir-wg Archives ]