Multihoming - Resilience or Independence
Stephen Burley stephenb at uk.uu.net
Wed Oct 10 17:07:24 CEST 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold at nipper.de> To: "Steven Bakker" <steven at icoe.att.com> Cc: "Stephen Burley" <stephenb at uk.uu.net>; "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>; "Dave Pratt" <djp-ripe-lists at djp.net>; <lir-wg at ripe.net>; <routing-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:56 PM Subject: Re: Multihoming - Resilience or Independence > > Read again. Stephen wrote "SLA on the routing of the address space". > > Global routing of anyone's address space is dependent on the routing > > policies of individual (third-party) ISPs. Some may be your direct > > peers and you can have agreements with them; many others won't and > > there's no way you can guarantee they'll route your customer's address > > space. The larger the prefix, the larger the chance of some network > > operator out there filtering it to oblivion. > > > > read again: the idea is to put all multi-homing customers in one region into > one prefix (ideally) (MH-pref) and one AS. The prefix should be large enough > to guarantee worldwide routing. Er you can not reserve space so you can not do this and if you give them enough space to garutee routing we are talking a /20 then that is LIR space size...hhmmm. > > > -- Arnold > > >
[ lir-wg Archives ]