more specific routes in today reality

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:21:09 +0200
Gert Doering <gert at Space.Net> wrote:

> "Multihoming" with something less than full tables won't really solve
> anything 

Right.

- as "multihoming without an AS number", it's some weird thing
> that has its place, but doesn't buy you much in the long run.


well. multihoming with private AS also could work. Combined with
Conditional Announcement, it's a really useful possibility. 

> (As for your example with the IX - this could be done without globally 
> visible space just fine, it's not "multihoming")

Well. IX space & DNS space is "IMHO" a special case which cannot be used
on corporate or business isp. 

We need some clean-up in the "special" cases. Swamp Space, pre-RIR phases
and more...

When we cannot clean up the "swamp" from the past, can we do clean work in 
the future ?

jan


-- 
 Jan-Ahrent Czmok        		http://www.lambda-solutions.de
 Technical Advisor ISP	    	        Hofdcker Str. 14, 65207 Wiesbaden
 Tel. +49-(0)-174-3074404