more specific routes in today reality
Jan-Ahrent Czmok czmok at lambda-solutions.de
Tue Oct 9 23:02:50 CEST 2001
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:38:36 -0400 "Lu, Ping" <PLu at cw.net> wrote: [..snip..] > Great! Now we have to collect routing policies from thousands of small LIRs > while still > have to deal with thousands of small prefixes. This is what i meant: if we "renumber" the old swamp space not only in RIPE Region, we have a cleaner routing table. many of the old swamp space "owners" are single homed, which would clean up a lot in the routing table if they are forced to use PA space from the respective provider. > And if the major ISPs stop listening to the more specfic routes then even > using the address from PI space won't work (unless you are big enough). Right, see my above comment. > All these solutions kind of imply that if you can't have /20 prefix then you > can't be multi-homed. What happen if a customer want to have an OC-48 > multi-homed link but only use prefix < /20 (that happens to the Internet > Exchange people a lot ) ? There should be also made some "golden networks" for the exchanges and "important" services, like DNS. This, correctly implemented together with the vendors, could make live easier: - route flap dampening works together seamless with the correct networks in "default" configurations. - more stability - less routes in routing table - clear "border" of address space together with registry borders. But again, these are only ideas from network operators. --jan -- Jan-Ahrent Czmok http://www.lambda-solutions.de Technical Advisor ISP Hofdcker Str. 14, 65207 Wiesbaden Tel. +49-(0)-174-3074404
[ lir-wg Archives ]