[hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal / reservation revisited?
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Tue Oct 2 12:37:52 CEST 2001
>PS To answer Wilfreds question, it is not reservation revisited it is >aggregation revisited ;) Stephen, in my opinion (from a technical persepctive only), there are two ways of attacking the problem: - 1) to clean up the legacy routes, you have to re-number (which I guess can be done within your address pool(s) - 2) to prevent it from happening again, someone, soemwhere, has to reserve a "big" block of addresses which would support a) additional demand by existing customers, and b) aggregation according to your network's internal structure Item 2) is where my notion of "reservation" is coming from. Do I still get it (completely) wrong? Btw, doing only one of those two is probably not going to work... Wilfried.
[ lir-wg Archives ]