[hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal / reservation revisited?

  To me, this rather sounds like a case for revisiting reservation, 
  rather than arguing for a new registry type/structure/rules.

  Am I missing something?
  Wilfried.
  ______________________________________________________________________

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:58:24 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
To: Adrian Bool <aid at vianw.net>
CC: lir-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:05:41PM +0100, Adrian Bool wrote:
> I feel that international networks require the ability to operate according 
> to the same rules as RIPE - just working on a smaller scale - as another 
> level down in the hierarchy.

Not only "international networks", but also national ones that have a
hierarchical structure of re-sellers.

> i.e We should should be able to apply for more IP space once we have 
> sub-allocated 80% of our allocation to our in-country networks  - natuarally 
> in a responsible manner, according to the same rules that an RIR would 
> allocate space to these in-country networks.

Sure.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299