RIPE-227?

At 17:37 09/11/01 +0100, Sabrina Waschke wrote:

>The robot doesn't recognize these two templates yet. This will be fixed.
>Thanks for reporting it, Hank.

So I stripped off the template tags and resubmitted and got back:

>PLEASE NOTE:
>This ticket has *NOT* been identified as a request for IP
>addresses or AS numbers.
>We will handle this message with lower priority than a request for IP
>addresses / AS numbers. If your mail in fact is a request for IP
>addresses / AS numbers, there are most likely missing / incorrect
>fields in your mail. Please make sure to correct and complete your
>request so that we can give it appropriate priority.

So if I submit with ASN template tags, your robot flags it as an error and 
returns it.  If I strip off the ASN tags then it gets sent to a lower 
priority queue.  What is the magic sequence that will allow my ASN request 
to enter a normal queue?

-Hank




>FYI:
>The RIPE NCC Database and Software Department are working on a whois
>library which will be able to parse and validate whois objects of any
>type - that will include multi-line fields, and strictly adhere to the
>internal format of the objects in the whois DB.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Sabrina Waschke
>
>--
>
>o------------------------------------------o
>| Sabrina Waschke         sabrina at ripe.net |
>| Registration Services Operations Manager |
>|                                          |
>| RIPE NCC             tel +31 20 535 4444 |
>| www.ripe.net         fax +31 20 535 4445 |
>o------------------------------------------o
>
>  Hank Nussbacher <hank at att.net.il> writes:
>  * Does anyone know if the RIPE robot supports RIPE-227 templates?  This
>  * fairly new template (Oct 2, 2001) for ASN requests.  The robot saw it
>  * as  of the 'RIPE147' type and then proceeded to flag as warnings:
>  *
>  * >-ANNOUNCED ADDRESS RANGES-
>  * >
>  * >
>  * >Warning #1
>  * >
>  * >Template was not recognised and *not* processed. Please
>  * >check your spelling!
>  * >
>  * >
>  * >-PEERING CONTACTS-
>  * >
>  * >
>  * >Warning #2
>  * >
>  * >Template was not recognised and *not* processed. Please
>  * >check your spelling!
>  *
>  * So either the template as listed in RIPE-227 is wrong or the robot is 
> broken
>  * .
>  *
>  * Thanks,
>  * Hank
>  *
>  *