Criteria for initial PA Allocation

| Much more important than working out the details of what criteria qualify
| you for a /22 would be what criteria will cause RIPE to revoke the /22 it
| has assigned.

The proposal was that in order to qualify for a "standard /20 PA block"
you would need to

>- Demonstrated efficient utilisation of a /xx (/22?)
>Or
>- Immediate need for a /xx (/22?)
>
>- Agree to renumber (Required? Recommended?)

So the proposal is that in order to get a /20 you need to provide
documentation that you need some percentage of that adress space (25%).

As current policy states, the assignments you make from this allocation are
only valid for as long as the criteria it was assigned under is stil valid.

While I agree that it at some point would be interesting to discuss how to
be more agressive reclaiming address space, I would urge the WG to focus on
the proposal from RIPE NCC:
- should we introduce a creiteria for PA allocations
- if so what should that criteria be.

-hph