Criteria for initial PA Allocation

| Hello.
|
| /22 is a much more reasonable value by my view... what percentage of
| members are ISPs ? :-)
| Perhaps its possible to typify in some way the organizations that actually
| do the requests, and start using different minimum PA allocation sizes.
| For instance... an ISP could get the minimal PA allocation of /20 the same
| way, but a bank or an insurance company, that normally represents a client
| for an ISP, could have a different minimal (and shorter!) PA allocation.

The purpose of this proposal was to make it more difficult for
small organisations to become a separate LIR in order to reduce the
workload on the RIPE NCC.

It will be a good ting for address space conservation, and it will be a
got thing for routing table size to "force" more organisations to go to
one of their upstream providers.

I do not think it is a good idea to make a smaller initial allocation size.

-hph