IPv6 addresses for Exchange Points
Hank Nussbacher hank at att.net.il
Fri May 11 10:36:49 CEST 2001
At 10:25 10/05/01 -0700, David R Huberman wrote: > > But they need connectivity for things like member > > mailing lists, www servers etc. anyway - which does not mean that those > > services have to (or even "should") be located at the IX itself, in the > > same IP prefix. > >I should have read this before I responded to Dave Pratt's email - Gert >said it far better than I did! > >For the purposes of this policy discussion, we must differentiate between >address space utilized explicitly for the interconnection of exchange >participants and space utilized for other purposes. What about a route reflector run at an exchange point with a LG to check things out? Wouldn't a globally routable IP address be called for in regards to the LG? -Hank >/david
[ lir-wg Archives ]