IPv6 addresses for Exchange Points

Euhm, can we fix this ? Whatever is happening ? I think 7 copies is
enough...

Thanks :)

On Thu, 10 May 2001 at 10:25 -0700, David R Huberman wrote:

> To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
> To: postmaster1 at wplus.net
>
>
> To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
> To: postmaster1 at wplus.net
>
>
> To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
> To: postmaster1 at wplus.net
>
>
> To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
> To: postmaster1 at wplus.net
>
>
> To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
> To: <20010510154913.C3919 at Space.Net>
>
>
> > But they need connectivity for things like member
> > mailing lists, www servers etc. anyway - which does not mean that those
> > services have to (or even "should") be located at the IX itself, in the
> > same IP prefix.
>
> I should have read this before I responded to Dave Pratt's email - Gert
> said it far better than I did!
>
> For the purposes of this policy discussion, we must differentiate between
> address space utilized explicitly for the interconnection of exchange
> participants and space utilized for other purposes.
>
> /david
>
>

-- 
GE d- s++:++ a- C+++$ U+ P+ L- E---- W- N++ o++++ w O- M-- PS+++
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5 X+ R* tv+ b- G e h r- y++