New Proposal
Janos Zsako zsako at banknet.net
Thu Mar 29 17:02:44 CEST 2001
> From owner-lir-wg at ripe.net Thu Mar 29 16:39:45 2001 > To: Janos Zsako <zsako at banknet.net> Stephen, > > I am just wondering whether "no status" really means "pre RIPE". > > I suspect it is not the case, as Daniel's document was discussed > > on the mailing list in May 1995 (and is dated 30 June 0995), while > > RIPE NCC did perform allocations much earlier as far as I remember. > > But in a classful enviroment. Correct. > > So my point is that the term "pre RIPE" may be misleading. > > > > What about "status: UK"? (UK for UnKnown :)) ) > > UK = United Kingdom Sure, this is why I put the smiley there. > What about CA = Classful Allocation Yes, this may be the right term, although it is not strictly related to this (if inetnum has status attribute it does not mean it is a classless allocation or assignment as classful allocations and assignments continued for another year or so after ripe-127 was published). "No status" means pre-ripe-136, dated May 1996 (as this is the document that made the status attribute mandatory) and classless assignments did start only after ripe-136 indeed, as far as I remember. Janos
[ lir-wg Archives ]