IPv6 for IXPs
Dave Pratt djp-ripe-lists at djp.net
Mon Jul 2 15:12:31 CEST 2001
Hiya Randy et al, On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Randy Bush wrote: ->i think of an ix as more like an isp than an end user enterprise. we are ->careful to allocate to isps based on reality, not hallucinations from the ->marketing department. Actually using 13 bits out of 128 for IPv6 (a /35 subTLA with a /48 minimum customer assignment) for a (global) ISP´s reservation, architecture and hierarchy, when customers get 80 bits for a dozen or less machines would seem to be based on hallucination and certainly not reality. It is a good thing the IETF say they are revisiting this - I just hope the outcome *is* based on reality. Could Randy (and others) please indicate why he appears to insist on the smallest possible assignment, at the risk of later needing either a multiple announcement or renumbering ? I find it hard to think that IPv6 addresses are in short supply when we have decided on a /48 mimimum assignment to end users. Cheers Dave
[ lir-wg Archives ]