Conclusions? Re: Fixed Boundary (/29) Assignments

David R Huberman;

> Monday has now concluded for most of the world, and we have now engaged in
> a fairly vibrant discussion of Leo Vegoda's residential broadband
> assignment presentation.
> 
> How should we proceed now, as a WG? 
> 
> Beyond just the remaining discussions, many of which will inevitably
> analyze an interesting facet of the main thread but which will not talk
> directly to the thread's focus, how else can we approach the idea of fixed
> boundary assignments before putting this to a vote? Leo, what are your
> views at this point? I think NCC staff input might be appropriate now.
> 
> It is my opinion that we should all be prepared to vote on a
> recommendation to the NCC at the Bologna meeting.
> 
> Thoughts/flames?

You should be aware that the issue is more fundamental than to vote
on an alternative way to conserve the space.

We will run out of the space anyway (perhaps sooner than you expect
because of various factors) that:

Leo Vegoda> This is consistent with the RIRs' goal of conservation.

the current purposeless conservation is a meaningless goal.

The meaningful goal is purposeful consumption.

							Masataka Ohta