Conclusions? Re: Fixed Boundary (/29) Assignments

Randy Bush wrote:

> i vote that large sites get a /8, medium a /16, and small a /24.  i always
> loved architecture by democracy.

Actually, I was going to put up a proposal that those providers who do
aggressive route filtering get a /16, and those that don't must use NAT.

But seriously, last I checked RIPE was still a member-driven organization.
In the absence of an issue which requires direct IETF oversight, I'm
pretty sure we still get to help shape the address assignment policies by
which we all must abide.

/david