90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: James Aldridge <jhma at KPNQwest.net>


Reply-To: <E15UTi5-0001hs-00 at aegir.EU.net>

 
> Of course, that one sub-TLA gives us a total amount of address space which is
> adequate for our current requirements for the whole network but once this is
> split over each of about 20 separate autonomous systems, each with their own
> routing policy, this is hardly going to result in optimally aggregatable
> routing...

And when you explain this to RIPE, how do they respond? If you can make a
bona fide engineering argument for obtaining more than one sub-TLA, it
seems to me that any RIR is obliged to seriously consider that argument.

/david