Deletion of .de domain objects
Nils Jeppe nils at work.de
Fri Jun 30 11:32:53 CEST 2000
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Michael Holzt wrote: > possible for members of the Denic eG, so many smaller providers who aren't > members, but are buying their domains from another one will have to redirect > all changes to this member. I treat this as a very brain-damaged system. No, it is not. It will greatly help with the consistency of Person objects. Several of our customers have several RIPE Handles - Just because each is mnt-by a different provider. > In the meanwhile we have Handles with the same key XYZ-RIPE, with different > contents in RIPE-db and DeNIC-db (not only the missing remarks, but also > phone and fax, and if someone makes changes to one of the two handles the > other will keep the old data). OBVIOUSLY since the Person handles have not yet been migrated, the person data in denic's database is not authoritive. > And then the past changes of the DeNIC to set unmaintained Handles under > their own Maintainer DENIC-P is abusive usage of the ripe database in my > eyes. They had no permission to change our handles and the change made no > sense, as the DeNIC won't support maintainers in their own database as > mentioned above. So WHY did you NOT set your own maintainer before Denic did so? I seem to remember quite clearly that there was advanced warning of this. You do realize that a person without a maintainer can be changed by ANYBODY? This is a serious security risk and could lead to the loss of domains, etc. > Why has this mess had to happen? Maybe because people like you don't pay attention until after the fact...? Best wishes, Nils Jeppe - ----------------------------------------------------------------- - n at work Internet Informationssysteme GmbH Tel +49 40 23880900 Spaldingstrasse 160d Fax +49 40 23880929 20097 Hamburg, Germany http://www.work.de/
[ lir-wg Archives ]