a few matters about security and consistency

> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> > > At 01:07 PM 7/6/00, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >
> > > >I think we need a NANOG more than a CERT.
> > >
> > > I thought we had RIPE for that. What does NANOG do that you need and
> > > RIPE does not do? A mailing list with a high S/N ratio ?
> >
> > Hmmm, there is no real "Network OPerators" list at RIPE, afaik.  By
> > that I mean, technical discussion about BGP issues, router configuration
> > issues, ongoing attacks, etc. - local-ir etc. is more for less technical
> > issues (as I see it).
> 
> What about EOF - European Operators Forum ?
> 
> The European Operators Forum deals with the operational issues of networks
> in Europe, such as new backbones and Internet Exchange Points.

Good  point. In fact EOF was created as the European equivalent of NANOG.

Nigel

-- 
Tel: +44 171 864 4450 Fax: +44 171 864 4488
Well I'm disenchanted too. We're all disenchanted (James Thurber)