IP assignment for virtual webhosting
Pedro Gonçalves pgoncalves at mail.telepac.pt
Wed Nov 17 15:38:57 CET 1999
Hi At 10:51 17-11-1999 +0100, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: > >OUR SUGGESTION > >The RIPE NCC has followed the deployment of HTTP 1.1 closely over the past >year. According to recent surveys, a vast majority of clients now support >HTTP 1.1 (namebased HTTP requests). It is our belief that the majority of >webserver applications support namebased webhosting as well. > >In recent years we have seen a boom in the registration of second-level >domains. This has led to a great demand for webhosting services. Using one >IP address per domain uses an enormous amount of IP addresses. With HTTP >1.1 this is no longer necessary. We therefore suggest to promote namebased >webhosting and to change the current policy so that IP addresses can no >longer be assigned for IP-based webhosting. > IMO prohibiting all use of public IP address for virtual webhosting solutions its going to be a step to far for now, since some of those addresses are used in SSL certificates. Maybe if we separate common V W hosting from Secure Web Hosting we can apply diferent policies. For example: Current Special verification Methods can be applyed for Secure Web Hosting address space and analised separatly, while the use of HTTP1.1 is promoted. Pedro Goncalves Telepac - Comunicações Interactivas
[ lir-wg Archives ]