[Fwd: FW: admin-c in inetnum]

-------- Original Message --------
Betreff: FW: admin-c in inetnum
Datum: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:08:17 +0100
Von: marcus.nutting at theplanet.net
An: lir-wg at ripe.net

We mostly use the same name for admin-c and tech-c at the moment.
Sometimes
using a customer name for admin-c.
I think that admin-c should be optional.
Perhaps if our customers want some point of contact.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lir-wg at ripe.net [mailto:owner-lir-wg at ripe.net]On Behalf Of
Paula Caslav
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 8:56 AM
To: lir-wg at ripe.net
Subject: admin-c in inetnum



Hello all,

It's good to see so much discussion. Just to clarify something, the
admin-c can be a role object. This is something that was decided 1 or 2
RIPE meetings ago. The latest release of the database code supports
this fully now. When you do a recursive look-up of an inetnum object
you will now see any role objects that were referenced in the admin-c
attribute (in the past you would only see role objects referenced in
tech-c but not admin-c).

I will wait until the end of the week for responses, and then try to
summarize the views here and come up with a suggestion.

Kind regards,

Paula Caslav
RIPE NCC