policy change: static verification methods

At 16:44 +0100 23/02/99, Paula Caslav wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>A few weeks ago I send the following proposal to the lir-wg mailing
>list for comments. Since no comments were received, we are assuming
>that nobody has objections to change the policy. We have therefore
>decided to implement it starting immediately.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Paula Caslav
>RIPE NCC
>

I agree mostly on the proposal. But please bear in mind that in most 
european places, local connection are not free. So another use of 
static IP is the setup of MX records on dialup connection that are 
down most of the time.

I understand also your concern to push http 1.1, but you _can't_ sell 
the virtual web hosting without a fixed IP. The percentage of non 
http 1.1 compliant browser is just too high for a business customer 
to accept that is vanity name will not be seen by those.
--
don't send mail to this account! It's a not often checked mail account.
use support at linkline.be instead.