Spammers hapless fate = ISP toil and sweat
Matt Ryan matt at planet.net.uk
Fri Sep 19 10:48:28 CEST 1997
Much as I wouldn't like to be seen agreeing with Neil, but his last point below is the most constructive comment to date. The delivery of email is a co-operative process, spammers (who don't relay through you) are NOT stealing your resources. They are using a valid distribution method to deliver email to your customers. If they generate all their spam via their own server (and I know some [most?] don't) then I think you are obliged to deliver it. Also any ISP who black-holes parts of the 'net is in danger of having their competitors use it against them in marketing material... Matt. -- Views expressed at not necessarily those of my employer. "Neil J. McRae" <neil at colt.net> added to the discussion: > > I don't remember you being named out apart from the action given to you > on the previous LINX meeting. > > As for spam, the first and most important issue regarding this is > to educate users and vendors into securing their mail transport agents > so that they _DO_NOT_ automatically relay any email that is sent to them. > > Microsoft, sendmail and others are all guilty of this, [mostly for > backwards compatibility reasons]. Fix that and then the spammers > have to pay for their own resources... > > Regards, > Neil >
[ lir-wg Archives ]