Spammers hapless fate = ISP toil and sweat
Pedro Ramalho Carlos prc at co.ip.pt
Thu Sep 18 23:49:24 CEST 1997
Nick, At 16:53 17-09-1997 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> The Internet needs unforgeable addresses, IP and "caller ID" equivalent. > >This is a good point, but unfortunately, we're still stuck with ipv4, which >is completely forgeable. If you've got even one rogue BGP site, they can >inject anything the feel like into the internet routing tables and do all >sorts of horrible things. > >I'm almost surprised that spammers haven't cottoned on to this yet -- they >could inject some temporary routes into the internet, use hosts on these >address ranges to bounce their spam off a 3rd-party relay site and then >withdraw the announcements. This would be almost totally untraceable and >would circumvent routing black holes completely -- for those who are using >routing black holes to try to control spamming. To do this they would have to BGP peer with somebody that does NOT filter prefixes from a customer connection (and that is a Bad Thing (tm)). Unless the spammer is an NSP itself. Ok, there are ways around this but I wouldn't even think of them, much less discuss them on a list :-) kind regards, --- pedro ramalho carlos Pedro.Carlos at co.ip.pt IP SA tel: +351-1-3166724 Av. Duque de Avila, 23 fax: +351-1-3166701 1000 LISBOA - PORTUGAL PGP Key fingerprint = B7 45 B2 F9 F3 1F 67 19 1F 24 76 67 8D F6 2C B2
[ lir-wg Archives ]