Proposal for Temporary Special Class A Space Guidelines
James Aldridge jhma at EU.net
Fri Mar 7 01:58:54 CET 1997
In message <199703061746.RAA28808 at halo.theplanet.net> you write: > > Instead of Class A, you could say "addresses in the range > > 1.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255" or something, but this could be > clumsy and why not use the term that means the same, anyway. > > How about just: > > 0.0.0.0/2 (old 'A' space) > 128.0.0.0/2 (old 'B' space) > 192.0.0.0/2 (old 'C' space) Surely 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/2, & 192.0.0.0/3 or else you erroneously exclude half the address space formerly classed as `A' (64.0.0.0/2) and include the 224.0.0.0/4 (`Class D'/Multicast) and 240.0.0.0/4 (`Class E') address blocks. How about simply using the phrase `former Class {A,B,C} space' when talking about these ranges, maybe with a note relating these to the 0/1, 128/2 and 193/3 notation. James ----- ___ - James Aldridge, Senior Network Engineer, ---- / / / ___ ____ _/_ -- EUnet Communications Services BV --- /--- / / / / /___/ / --- Singel 540, 1017 AZ Amsterdam, NL -- /___ /___/ / / /___ /_ ---- Tel: +31 20 530 5327; Fax: +31 20 622 4657 - ----- 24hr emergency number: +31 20 421 0865
[ lir-wg Archives ]