Proposal for Temporary Special Class A Space Guidelines
John Murray John.Murray at planet.net.uk
Thu Mar 6 18:46:52 CET 1997
Hi, > > . I'm slightly unhappy with the frequent use of the terms "class A" and > > "class C". I think we are trying for a while now to sort of phase-out > > the usage of these terms. So I'd prefer to > > > > - clearly qualify the usage of these terms as obsolete, or "old > > classful terminology", > > > > - wherever possible, please replace "class x" with the appropriate > > address range. I think this would make the paper more obvious > > anyway. > > Not an easy one. Sure, you can put the offending terms in > quotes, as Wilfried does, to indicate disdain for this old > politically incorrect terminology. But there's no getting > away from the fact that when you say Class A in the document, > you really mean Class A and not /8 - you don't mean that > 196.0.0.0/8, for example, comes under the heading of Class A > for the purposes of special allocation. > > Instead of Class A, you could say "addresses in the range > 1.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255" or something, but this could be > clumsy and why not use the term that means the same, anyway. How about just: 0.0.0.0/2 (old 'A' space) 128.0.0.0/2 (old 'B' space) 192.0.0.0/2 (old 'C' space) Cheers john
[ lir-wg Archives ]