Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

On Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:49:48 -0800 you said:
>We've got a basic conflict between "smaller" and "better", whose resolution
>will require (in the absense of really good renumbering technology)
>constraining our insistance on efficient address utilization by measuring
>the effect this has on routing tables.  We need to get some quantitative
>goals assigned to this so we can measure what is "good" and "bad".  I'd
>(again) suggest the following:

A /19 in Amsterdam makes sense as a maximum allocation.  A /19 in Uganda
doesn't.  I think due to different geographics we need to realize
that allocation policy has to be different depending on where you are.

Hank