Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

At 02:16 PM 2/2/96 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:

>> 
>> > 	We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now.
>> > 	Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG)
>> > 
>> > 		60% - invalid or missing contact information
>> 
>> This is interesting.  How about a policy that says if nobody can contact you
>> and none of your addresses are reachable, then after some period, your
>> addresses get recycled.
>
>How about a policy which says that if you fail to pay an annual amount
>by a due date then a process is commenced with an outcome such that
>your registration details expire and the associated number space is no
>longer registered to you.
>
>Geoff
>

Would this process, perhaps, be associated with a route announcement
charging scheme?

- paul