Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
Bill Manning bmanning at ISI.EDU
Thu Feb 1 23:29:21 CET 1996
> > > > Another factoid to consider - I know of a company that has a Class C that > > > they don't use. To my knowledge, nobody has ever even asked that > > > they give it up. Some automated email process could do this without > > > much effort. > > > > > Well, almost. The IPGR robot is, in fact, doing just that. > > Based on never having received such an email and knowing of > several others who haven't either, I disagree. > "All in good time my pretty..." We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now. Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG) 60% - invalid or missing contact information 25% - in use & unwilling to renumber 15% - willing to renumber or return This is from ~6,000 delegated entries. If all goes well, we can find some new area to work on sometime in later this year. Have any suggestions? 198.x.x.x? The old /16 space? --bill
[ lir-wg Archives ]