last second action completed

I do agree in general with the idea, but can we (ISP's) provide the same
level of service to those VSE's ?
How are we (Local IR's) going to handle Domain Name Services for
those VSE's customers ? With an emphasis on in-addr.arpa resolving ?

/Alain


On Mon, 08 May 1995 13:57:38 +0200  Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>This is to complete an action on Mike Norris to re-send
>the original message concerning VSEs.
>
>Please refer to the archives for the discussion
>that followed.
>
>Daniel
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date:     Fri, 20 May 1994 09:57:15 +0200
>From:     Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net>
>Sender:   dfk at reif.ripe.net
>To:       Erik-Jan Bos <erik-jan.bos at surfnet.nl>
>cc:       Local IR <local-ir at ripe.net>
>Subject:  Re: Address space for individuals 
>
>
>  > Erik-Jan Bos <erik-jan.bos at SURFnet.nl> writes:
>  > > This sums up my personal opinion.
>  > 
>  > Great, quite along my personal opinion, but we need a consistent
>  > approach among all Local IRs.
>
>We will write something up next week. If someone else does before
>us we can use that!
>
>My proposal would read like:
>
>	- very small enterprises (VSEs) are those <32 hosts now
>
>	- last resort registries will not assign address space to VSEs
>
>		- VSEs can use private address space (RFC1697)
>		- VSEs are easy to renumber once they connect
>		- VSEs are likely to connect with one host only
>
>	- service provider registries will assign VSEs smaller amounts
>          of address space than 8 bits where possible
>
>	- service provider registries will register these smaller amounts
>	  in the RIPE database when possible
>
>Rationale:
>
>	Very many VSEs with 8 bits of address space each will use up
>	too much address space.
>
>	
>
>Is this acceptable to all?
>
>Implementation: If this was accepted the NCC could accept classles 
>inetnums very soon even before the indexing is fully classless.
>
>Question: Should we publish such things as RIPE documents or just
>circulate them among registries as "current practise recommendations".
>I personally think we should publish them, but have heared reservations.
>
>Daniel
>
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>

-------------------------------------
E-mail: Alain Golan <alain at NetVision.net.il>
Date: 05/08/95
Time: 16:02:40

This message was sent by Chameleon 
-------------------------------------