Last Resort Registries
Ivo Gorkic ivo.gorkic at quantum.si
Mon Jul 31 17:22:15 CEST 1995
At 03:22 PM 7/21/95 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > > Antonio_Blasco Bonito <bonito at nis.garr.it> writes: > > > > I think it *is* relevant: we are talking about CIDR aggregatable addresses. > > Some US providers do not want to provide addresses to customers in Europe > > from their own address space to save the possibility of continental > > aggregation. This is a point which needs to be clarified at least to > > correctly define the role of Regional registries. > >I only know of one such case and this provider has since changed their >mind (regid eu.sprint). > > > > > I think this document > > > > should have worldwide applicability and be published as an RFC. > > > > > > Do not agree. For European Last-Resort registries a RIPE document is > > > sufficient. > > > > That's not sufficient, I guess. We could start with a RIPE document but > > I'm convinced the issue is *not* restricted to Europe. > >We start with a RIPE document. The problem with an RFCs is that there are >many highly contentious issues associated with a successor to RFC1466. >This document is not going to be agreed quickly. However we need a >revision of ripe-104. So far we have been waiting. ripe-104 is now >sufficiently outdated to go ahead with a revision anyway. I just hope >that we can agree on one in Europe. > >I would prefer it to go the other way round but there seems to >be little choice. > > > RIPE-181 became an RFC for the same reason. Am I right? > >It is an informational RFC about a technology, not about address space >policies. > >Daniel > > > --------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Gorkic Quantum d.o.o. Stegne 21d tel: +386 61 159 72 56 61000 Ljubljana fax: +386 61 159 71 92 Slovenija e-mail: ivo.gorkic at quantum.si ---------------------------------------------------------
[ lir-wg Archives ]