Last Resort Registries
poole at eunet.ch poole at eunet.ch
Thu Jul 20 22:59:22 CEST 1995
> > Perhaps you don't have big companies in Switzerland, whatever do I know > about Switzerland. But there are cases when Big Company connect to a > small outside company, providing something special and as Small Company > don't connect to Internet they must use RFC 1597 and eventually > Small-2 has been told the same story and use the same first numbers > from RFC 1597, but when Big Company want to have a link to Small-2 > as well, this becomes a problem. If you'd followed the IETF list you would know that I made a comment pointing these problems out a -long- time ago, in particular from the point of collisions RFC-1597 is substantially worse than picking addresses at random (and no better than the time honored tradition of using addresses from Sun). > > Simon, you don't seem to understand the real problem. Coordination > has to be done on every possible level. Personally I don't care > whatsoever about those that we force to use private address space, > but they will eventually run into problems, so beeing last-resort > we ouht to take our responsibilty and coordinate thing that are > currently in a mess. Private addres space is -private-: useful for networking all the power meters in Switzerland and similar sensible things, it cannot be an ersatz public address space. In your example: where do you stop? What happens if Big Company wants to connect to companies in Denmark and Norway (and Switzerland and Germany and France and Italy .......)? You ARE creating a second public address space. Simon
[ lir-wg Archives ]