Last Resort Registries
Bjorn Eriksen ber at sunet.se
Thu Jul 20 19:59:37 CEST 1995
>> and where RFC 1597 might be a problem, as there is no coordination who >> has picked something from RFC 1597 (perhaps a new task for last-resorts >> to coordination the national use of RFC 1597), then it does happen that >HELP! So we suddenly make -private- address space semi-public, then >we might just as well start allocating the current address space a second >time. Perhaps you don't have big companies in Switzerland, whatever do I know about Switzerland. But there are cases when Big Company connect to a small outside company, providing something special and as Small Company don't connect to Internet they must use RFC 1597 and eventually Small-2 has been told the same story and use the same first numbers from RFC 1597, but when Big Company want to have a link to Small-2 as well, this becomes a problem. Simon, you don't seem to understand the real problem. Coordination has to be done on every possible level. Personally I don't care whatsoever about those that we force to use private address space, but they will eventually run into problems, so beeing last-resort we ouht to take our responsibilty and coordinate thing that are currently in a mess. --Bjorn
[ lir-wg Archives ]