Address space for individuals

Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> 
> 
> My proposal would read like:
> 
> 	- very small enterprises (VSEs) are those <32 hosts now
> 
> 	- last resort registries will not assign address space to VSEs
> 
> 		- VSEs can use private address space (RFC1697)
> 		- VSEs are easy to renumber once they connect
> 		- VSEs are likely to connect with one host only
> 
> 	- service provider registries will assign VSEs smaller amounts
>           of address space than 8 bits where possible
> 
> 	- service provider registries will register these smaller amounts
> 	  in the RIPE database when possible
> 
> Rationale:
> 
> 	Very many VSEs with 8 bits of address space each will use up
> 	too much address space.
> 
> 	
> 
> Is this acceptable to all?
> 

 Fully agree

> Implementation: If this was accepted the NCC could accept classles 
> inetnums very soon even before the indexing is fully classless.
> 
> Question: Should we publish such things as RIPE documents or just
> circulate them among registries as "current practise recommendations".
> I personally think we should publish them, but have heared reservations.
> 
> Daniel
> 

-- 
Arnold Nipper                            /         email: nipper at xlink.net
NTG Netzwerk und Telematic GmbH        \/          phone: +49 721 9652 0
Geschaeftsbereich XLINK                /\ LINK     fax:   +49 721 9652 210
Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 3             /_______
D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany