DRAFT local registries list

  > Geert Jan de Groot <geertj at ica.philips.nl> writes:
  > On Fri, 19 Nov 93 14:53:18 +0100  Erik-Jan.Bos at SURFnet.nl wrote:
  > > 3. This is more or less a feeling-issue (and *no*, I am not a native
  > >    speaker), but SURFnet is listed as "Non-Service Provider". This
  > >    sounds to me as "Provider of a Non-Service". Maybe another word
  > >    could be used, such as "NIC of last resort" or "Default NIC". But
  > >    again, I am not a native speaker.
  > 
  > Would 'Service-Provider' and 'No Service-Provider' sound better to you?
  > 
  > Geert Jan
  > 
Geert Jan,

seems like the term "Registry of last resort" to describe the current
"Non Provider" label agrees with a number of people.  Unless anyone has
any better suggestions I propose to go with this.

anne