in-addr.arpa zone data in RIPE database
Antonio_Blasco Bonito bonito at nis.garr.it
Tue Mar 2 15:44:09 CET 1993
> > Interaction is fine. But RIPE stepping into someone else's > authority is quite something different! > I don't see any problem with that as long as we (european > networking people) agree to send update to the RIPE-NCC > instead of sending them to the NIC. > RIPE-DB and DNS are entirely different objects. Yes, indeed. Nonetheless I think it would be extremely useful for network managers in Europe to send their DNS updates to the RIPE-NCC only, knowing that they interface the NIC about the DNS root servers updates. Daniel, you can poll RIPErs on this, can you? > I would > like RIPE to notify me *in some cases* about discrepancies > between my entries in the RIPE-DB and my DNS entries, but > I do *NOT* want RIPE to step into my authority by asking > or telling the NIC to change *MY* DNS info because they > found discrepancies: I may well have good reason why those > discrepancies exist. If someone in Europe likes to have discrepancies, for whatever reason, he can certainly tell to RIPE-NCC: please do not forward my updates to the NIC! ---------- ---------- Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246 Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I 56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052 ---------- ----------
[ lir-wg Archives ]